Document Studio

Overview

Most writing tools start by inventing. Document Studio starts with what you already have.

Paste your notes, upload a draft, or add a link, and it restructures that material into a finished document — a customer newsletter, an internal update, a research brief, a training explainer. It adds nothing you did not give it, and it says so plainly when the material is too thin to fill the length you asked for.

If you do want it to look things up, that is a separate switch you turn on deliberately, and the price changes in front of you before you commit.

How It Works

1. Say what you want written — A sentence is enough. "A monthly update for customers covering the three releases in my notes."
2. Choose where the facts come from — This is the important choice, and it is explained below.
3. Add your material — Paste text, upload a PDF or Word file, or drop in a link.
4. Pick a style — Business, research, education, medical, legal or financial. Each changes the register and the rules the writing is held to.
5. Pick a structure, if the document has one — Newsletter, one-page briefing, memo, meeting minutes, standard operating procedure, press release or case study. Each one says what it is for and when a different one would suit you better. Free-form is the default.
6. Or match a document you already wrote — Upload last month’s issue, or the report your team expects every quarter, and its headings become this document’s headings. Nothing inside it is quoted or cited; it is used as a shape and then dropped. If it turns out to have no repeatable shape, you are told so rather than handed an invented outline. This one needs an account.
7. Let it ask you a few questions, if you like — Optional, and off unless you tick it. It reads your brief and your material and asks only about what it could not work out from them — an in-house acronym, a team name, who exactly is reading this. Answer what is useful and skip the rest; anything you leave blank stays blank rather than being guessed at.
8. Read the result — The document, its sources, and a writing check that flags what still reads as machine-written.

Where The Facts Come From

The three modes are not quality tiers. They are different jobs.

Polish my material only

The default, and the one most people want. It uses nothing but what you provide. It restructures, tightens, fixes the grammar and imposes a clear shape — and it invents no facts, looks nothing up, and cites nothing. No external service is contacted. It is the cheapest option and it always will be.

If your material is thinner than the length you asked for, it writes a shorter document rather than padding one out.

Check against my sources

Writes from your material, then flags any sentence your own documents do not actually carry. Useful when you are assembling a summary from several files and want to know which claims came from where. Still no web lookup.

Research it online

Finds current sources, cites them, and checks that each citation genuinely supports the sentence attached to it. The most expensive option, and the only one that contacts anything outside.

It searches first and shows you what it found. Nothing is written, and nothing is cited, until you have looked at the list and ticked what you want used. Results that do not appear to be about your topic arrive unticked, with the reason — but they are still shown, because the check is a word-matching rule and it cannot know that SPICE is your hand-hygiene programme rather than the food. If it has that wrong, tick them anyway.

Each result also says what kind of site it is, and when it was published. An official body, a journal, somebody's blog, a shop — or, honestly, "not recognised, check it yourself", which is what a great many perfectly good sources get, because we would rather say we do not know than guess. The year comes from what the page states; where it states none, it says so, since a citation with no date is how a fifteen-year-old page passes for current. In a medical, legal, financial or research document we add a line when a result is not the usual kind of source for that field. It unticks nothing — being about your subject and being the right thing to cite are two different questions, and only you can answer the second.

If the whole list is about the wrong thing, say what your topic actually is in your own words and search again. That correction is the most useful sentence you can give it: if a term in your brief is an abbreviation or a name used where you work, this is the place to say what it stands for.

Reviewing what came back costs nothing. The search is priced separately and the document is priced down to match, so looking before you commit works out the same as not looking.

Key Features

Citations that cannot be invented

The model is never allowed to write a URL. It cites by reference to a numbered list of material the server already holds, and the server resolves each reference afterwards. A citation pointing at something that does not exist cannot survive the round trip — it is removed, the sentence is marked as unsupported, and you are told it happened.

This is why the document tells you when it is unsure. Most tools cannot.

The writing check

A deterministic pass over the finished text, looking for the specific tells of machine writing: "not just X, but Y" constructions, em-dash pile-ups, uniform sentence rhythm, invisible characters left behind by a model, promotional filler.

It flags. It does not rewrite. The only thing changed automatically is mechanical debris that cannot alter your meaning.

Taking it out: Word, PDF, rich text, or an email

The finished document downloads as a Word file, a print-ready PDF, or rich text you can paste anywhere. There is also an email version, which gives you both parts an email needs — the HTML and a real plain-text alternative — rather than an HTML blob that arrives as a wall of tags for anyone reading in plain text.

The formatting is deliberately plain: black text on white, generous margins, and your own heading colour if you have set one. It is your document going to your client, not ours, so the full tool puts nothing on the page advertising where it was written. Downloads from this demo do carry a line saying they were made here — that is the demo, not the tool.

None of this costs extra. You paid to write it; putting the same words in a different container is not a second charge.

Steps and checklists come out as real lists

A procedure is not prose. Numbered steps and bulleted checks are laid out as lists in every format, with the wrapped lines aligned under the text rather than under the number. The numbering is applied when the document is built, not written into the sentence, so it stays correct when you move an item.

It spots the notes you meant to keep to yourself

Your material contains notes as well as content. A "TODO", an open question, a figure someone told you but nobody checked — these read as content to any tool that starts from your own writing, and they can end up restated in the finished document. They are flagged in the writing check so you can cut them before you send. As always, flagged and not removed: only you know which of them were meant to be there.

A clean copy to send, a review copy to keep

When sentences are flagged, those flags are your working notes — and the last thing you want is a client opening a proposal with "not in your sources" in the margin. So every download is clean by default. One checkbox gives you the review copy instead: each flagged paragraph marked, and "not for distribution" stamped on it.

Saying a tool helped write it — your call

Some organisations have to declare when a document was machine-assisted. Others would rather their client saw a proposal, not a tool. So it is a checkbox, and the line it adds is one plain sentence at the foot of the document. In this demo the line is fixed on, because the demo is ours; in the tool it is yours to turn off, and it is off unless you ask for it.

Your images are never stored

Attach up to eight pictures and say what each one is for as you add it: a banner across the very top, a picture in the text, or a full-page activity that gets a page to itself. A picture in the text can run full width or sit beside its neighbour — two halves pair up on a line, and the captions stay under their own picture rather than merging into one.

Captions and purpose are set where you attach. Which section a picture follows is the one thing you choose afterwards, next to the finished document, because that is when the document has sections to choose from.

The pictures themselves are never kept. They sit in your browser while you work, travel with the download at the moment you ask for it, and are dropped as soon as it is built — there is no copy to come back for. Which also means they are gone when you close the page, so download your document before you leave.

Charts it draws itself, and your logo on the front

Ask for a figure and it is drawn with real type, not generated as a picture — so the labels are the words you asked for, spelled correctly, at a size you can read. The chart is chosen to fit what your material actually says: a trend line when the direction is the point, a dated timeline, before and after, a drop-off funnel, a bubble cluster, a gauge against a target, a two-by-two, a cycle, a hierarchy, bars, key figures, a step diagram or a comparison table. Every number in it came from your own material — nothing is worked out, so you will not find a percentage or a difference the document never stated.

Something with a title page can carry your logo above the title; without one it sits at the top left, level with the heading. Logos are scaled to a matching height, so a square badge and a long wordmark carry the same weight instead of one dwarfing the other.

Tables stay tables

A rate card, a schedule or a specification is something a reader works with rather than looks at, so it comes out as a real table: editable rows in Word, ruled lines in the PDF, proper markup in the rich text and the email version. The tool decides between a table and a comparison chart by what you will do with it next, which is the only question that actually separates them.

A page that is laid out, not just written

Short titled points come out as a row of boxes rather than one paragraph after another, numbered if they are a sequence, with bullets inside a box if a point needs them. One line that matters more than the rest can sit in a highlighted band. Both survive into Word, the PDF, the web page and the email version, and the band is marked by a coloured bar rather than only a tint — so it still reads as emphasis on a black-and-white office printer.

There are three ways to put something in a box and the tool picks between them by one question: could a column heading be written over these items? If it could, that is a table. If they are short titled points with nothing in common at the top, they are boxes. If it is a quantity or a relationship, it is drawn.

Put things where you want them

Every chart, table, box of points and photograph used to sit at the end of its section. Now you choose: pick the paragraph it should follow, and it moves there in the Word file, the PDF and the web page alike. So a sentence that says "the chart below" has the chart below it.

You can also end a page wherever you like — one click under any paragraph, and the next paragraph starts a fresh sheet.

And a box of points can lead with one of your own pictures, sitting above its title, the way a printed newsletter runs a photograph over each column. Pick any picture you have already put in that section. Email is the one exception: mail programs will not show pictures reliably, so those boxes arrive as plain boxes.

Change what came back

You do not have to run the whole thing again to fix one paragraph. Say what should be different about a section and it is rewritten in place — free, because you already paid to have those words written. A figure can be redrawn the same way for two tokens, and a section can be given decorative artwork for four.

Two rules hold. A rewrite may rework what it was given and may not introduce anything new, so it cannot quietly add a fact your material does not carry. And a rewritten sentence loses its "supported" mark, because the check was made about words that no longer exist — showing you nothing is more honest than showing you a tick that no longer means anything.

The artwork is abstract and carries no words, and we check that rather than assume it. Every picture is read back before you get it, and one with stray lettering in it is refused rather than delivered. A refusal costs you nothing.

If you write about patients, it will stop you

Patient information is refused by default — names, dates of birth, record numbers and the rest — and the check runs whatever style you picked, not only the medical one. Identifying details do not become safe because the document is a business update. It looks in your pasted material as well as your brief, because that is where it actually turns up, and the message names what it found and links straight to our redaction tool.

The medical style adds the rest of its rules on top. A heading like "Patient Care: What Changed This Quarter" is a heading, not a name, and is not treated as one.

You can acknowledge it and carry on if you have the authority to make that call. That is an attestation you are giving, not a switch you are flipping, and it is recorded as one.

Notices that have to be there, are there

Some subjects carry a notice the document is required to print — a medical disclaimer, a legal one, a financial one. Where the style and the subject call for it, the notice is worked out from the finished text and printed at the foot of the file, in every format. It is not something you can forget to switch on and it is not decided by your browser.

Priced before you commit

The cost is itemised on screen and moves as you change the settings, so you can see exactly what research or a longer document adds. Nothing is charged if generation fails, and anything you paid for that did not run is given back.

Good For

• Customer and internal newsletters built from scattered notes
• Turning a rough draft into something you would send
• Research briefs where you need to know which claims are actually sourced
• Training and explainer material
• Reports assembled from several documents at once

Trying It Here

This demo runs the polish path: it takes up to two pieces of your material and writes up to 600 words from them, using the standard model. That is enough to see whether it actually holds the line on inventing facts, which is the thing worth testing.

You can download what it writes — Word, PDF, rich text and the email version all work here. Pictures ride along in the first three; the email version says where each one would have gone, because an email that carries images is an email that lands in spam.

You can also put a picture behind the page here — on the cover, on every page after it, or on one section — as a full bleed, a band across the top, or a panel down the side. A wash is laid over the artwork before the words go on, and you can move it. Word applies backgrounds to the cover and to the body pages rather than to a single section; the PDF and rich text do all three, and the export tells you when it has had to leave one out.

Rewriting a section works here too, since it costs nothing. Redrawing a figure, having the tool draw artwork for you, and charts do not — those are charged, so they need an account.

The full tool lifts both limits, adds the two source-checking modes, takes your attached images and drawn charts, draws background artwork for you from a set of abstract themes, puts your logo and brand colour on the exports, lets you turn the AI-assisted line off, and saves your work to your history.

Limitations

• Automatic claim-checking is a genuine help, not a guarantee. Read what it flags.
• Scanned PDFs with no text layer cannot be read. Paste the text instead.
• Attached images must be PNG, JPEG, WebP or GIF. SVG is refused, because an SVG is a program as much as a picture. Photographs straight off a phone or camera are fine — they are resized in your browser as you attach them, so you do not have to shrink anything first. Anything past eight images is left out and named on the download so you know what is missing. Artwork you bought counts towards the eight and is never the thing dropped — the button tells you when you have reached the limit rather than taking your tokens and cutting the picture afterwards.
• The email version cannot carry pictures at all. It names each one and where it sat. Use Word or PDF if the images matter.
• The medical style is deliberately conservative: it describes evidence and will not advise, diagnose, or present itself as a clinician.
• The legal style explains what the law says. It will not apply it to your situation, write as your attorney, or advise you — that is a lawyer's job, not a tool's.
• The financial style will not promise or project a return, however the request is phrased.
• A structure tells you what is missing; it does not fill it in. A memo with no date comes back with the date blank and the gap named, because inventing one would hand you a document that looks finished and is wrong.
• It will not write testimonials, reviews or patient stories. Paste a real one and it will be formatted and attributed properly.